What recorded crime and a victimisation survey together say about the crime that is never recorded, as intervals that hold under stated limits on the errors (Manski 2003).
Usage
dkfig(
v = NULL,
r = NULL,
amax = 0,
bmax = 0,
thr = NULL,
va = NULL,
ra = NULL,
rb = NULL,
lam = 1,
k = NULL
)Arguments
- v
NULL, or survey (true) victimisation rates: numbers from 0 to 1.- r
The recorded rates: one number or one per
v, from 0 to 1.- amax, bmax
The largest false-positive and false-negative rates of the survey: numbers from 0, with a sum below 1.
- thr
NULL, or a threshold above everyv.- va, ra, rb
NULL, or the survey's offences of the covered type, the recorded ones of that type (both above 0,raat mostva) and the recorded offences of the uncovered type (from 0).- lam
The least ratio of the uncovered type's recording rate to the covered type's: above 0, at most 1.
- k
NULL, or the number of offences in each incident: whole numbers from 1.
Value
An object of class dkfig, a list: bnd (with v: v, r,
lo, hi, dlo, dhi the dark figure's bounds, ratio the upper
bound over the recorded rate, and with thr brk), cmp (with va:
rate A's recording rate, rateup, the total's bounds totlo,
tothi, the dark figure's dklo, dkhi and width) and hier
(with k: incid, offen, ratio, extra, lower, upper); the
parts not asked for are NULL.
Details
With a survey rate
vand a recorded rater, and survey false positives at mostamaxand false negatives at mostbmax, the true rate lies in[max(r, (v - amax) / (1 - amax)), min(1, v / (1 - bmax))]and the dark figure (true minus recorded) in that interval shifted byr. Giventhr,brkis the largestbmaxunder which the conclusion "the true rate is belowthr" survives:1 - v / thr.When the survey covers only some offences (type A,
vaof them,rarecorded) and the recorded count of the rest isrb, recorded at no less thanlamtimes A's rate, the total and the dark figure have the bounds incmp.With
k, the number of offences in each recorded incident, the hierarchy rule's arithmetic: one incident in the counts stands for between 1 andmax(k)offences.
See proof("dkfig").
References
Manski, C. F. (2003). Partial Identification of Probability Distributions. Springer. doi:10.1007/b97478
Examples
dkfig(v = c(0.12, 0.08), r = 0.03, amax = 0.01, bmax = 0.2, thr = 0.15)
#> dkfig: bounds on the dark figure
#> v r lo hi dlo dhi ratio brk
#> 1 0.12 0.03 0.11111111 0.15 0.08111111 0.12 5.000000 0.2000000
#> 2 0.08 0.03 0.07070707 0.10 0.04070707 0.07 3.333333 0.4666667
dkfig(va = 900, ra = 300, rb = 450, lam = 0.5)
#> dkfig: bounds on the dark figure
#> rate rateup totlo tothi dklo dkhi
#> 0.3333333 0.5555556 1350.0000000 3600.0000000 600.0000000 2850.0000000
#> width
#> 2250.0000000
dkfig(k = c(1, 1, 2, 1, 3))
#> dkfig: bounds on the dark figure
#> incid offen ratio extra lower upper
#> 5.0 8.0 1.6 0.6 5.0 15.0