Skip to contents

Sprott-Doob-Iftene (May 2021) Table 15: long-stay no-IEDM cases

Usage

morie_siu_sprott_doob_iftene_table15()

Value

A morie_siu_result.

Examples

head(morie_siu_sprott_doob_iftene_table15())
#> $title
#> [1] "Sprott, Doob & Iftene (May 2021) Table 15 -- Long-stay SIU cases with NO IEDM record (N=1,979)"
#> 
#> $summary_lines
#> $summary_lines$`N total stays examined`
#> [1] 1979
#> 
#> $summary_lines$`Long-stay (>=76d) with NO IEDM`
#> [1] "105 cases (29+27+49)"
#> 
#> $summary_lines$`>120d with NO IEDM`
#> [1] "49 cases (35.8% of 137 long-stay >120d cases)"
#> 
#> $summary_lines$Headline
#> [1] "105 cases stayed 76+ days in an SIU with no IEDM record -- apparent compliance failure with CCRA s.37.8"
#> 
#> 
#> $tables
#> $tables[[1]]
#> $tables[[1]]$title
#> [1] "SIU stay length x IEDM-flag"
#> 
#> $tables[[1]]$data
#>     days no_iedm with_iedm total no_iedm_pct
#> 1   <=65    1580        21  1601        98.7
#> 2  66-75      30        40    70        42.9
#> 3  76-90      29        51    80        36.3
#> 4 91-120      27        64    91        29.7
#> 5   >120      49        88   137        35.8
#> 
#> 
#> 
#> $interpretation
#> [1] "Reproduces Table 15. The CCRA requires IEDM review for stays beyond 60 days, but 105 stays of 76+ days in this dataset had NO record of any IEDM review. Even more striking: 49 of the 137 stays >120 days (35.8%) had no IEDM record. This is a structural failure of the SIU oversight regime."
#> 
#> $warnings
#> character(0)
#> 
#> $payload
#> $payload$table15_may2021
#>     days no_iedm with_iedm total no_iedm_pct
#> 1   <=65    1580        21  1601        98.7
#> 2  66-75      30        40    70        42.9
#> 3  76-90      29        51    80        36.3
#> 4 91-120      27        64    91        29.7
#> 5   >120      49        88   137        35.8
#> 
#> $payload$long_stay_no_iedm
#> [1] 105
#> 
#>