
Sprott-Doob-Iftene (May 2021) Table 15: long-stay no-IEDM cases
Source:R/sprott_doob.R
morie_siu_sprott_doob_iftene_table15.RdSprott-Doob-Iftene (May 2021) Table 15: long-stay no-IEDM cases
Examples
head(morie_siu_sprott_doob_iftene_table15())
#> $title
#> [1] "Sprott, Doob & Iftene (May 2021) Table 15 -- Long-stay SIU cases with NO IEDM record (N=1,979)"
#>
#> $summary_lines
#> $summary_lines$`N total stays examined`
#> [1] 1979
#>
#> $summary_lines$`Long-stay (>=76d) with NO IEDM`
#> [1] "105 cases (29+27+49)"
#>
#> $summary_lines$`>120d with NO IEDM`
#> [1] "49 cases (35.8% of 137 long-stay >120d cases)"
#>
#> $summary_lines$Headline
#> [1] "105 cases stayed 76+ days in an SIU with no IEDM record -- apparent compliance failure with CCRA s.37.8"
#>
#>
#> $tables
#> $tables[[1]]
#> $tables[[1]]$title
#> [1] "SIU stay length x IEDM-flag"
#>
#> $tables[[1]]$data
#> days no_iedm with_iedm total no_iedm_pct
#> 1 <=65 1580 21 1601 98.7
#> 2 66-75 30 40 70 42.9
#> 3 76-90 29 51 80 36.3
#> 4 91-120 27 64 91 29.7
#> 5 >120 49 88 137 35.8
#>
#>
#>
#> $interpretation
#> [1] "Reproduces Table 15. The CCRA requires IEDM review for stays beyond 60 days, but 105 stays of 76+ days in this dataset had NO record of any IEDM review. Even more striking: 49 of the 137 stays >120 days (35.8%) had no IEDM record. This is a structural failure of the SIU oversight regime."
#>
#> $warnings
#> character(0)
#>
#> $payload
#> $payload$table15_may2021
#> days no_iedm with_iedm total no_iedm_pct
#> 1 <=65 1580 21 1601 98.7
#> 2 66-75 30 40 70 42.9
#> 3 76-90 29 51 80 36.3
#> 4 91-120 27 64 91 29.7
#> 5 >120 49 88 137 35.8
#>
#> $payload$long_stay_no_iedm
#> [1] 105
#>
#>