
Party competition: vote shares, Hotelling-Downs equilibria, strategic voting, entry, bargaining, committees
Source:R/PartyCompetition.R
VoteShares.RdVoteShares: proximity (ties split) or logit shares with
salience-weighted Euclidean distances. BestResponseEquilibrium:
sequential best responses on a grid (a move needs a gain above 1e-12; the
lowest improving index wins). StrategicVoteShares: Cox's M + 1
viable parties and wasted-vote switching. EntryGame: incumbents
best-respond anticipating the entrant's best response (Palfrey 1984).
EffectiveNumberParties: Laakso-Taagepera and Golosov.
RubinsteinBargaining: (1 - delta2) / (1 - delta1 delta2).
MedianParty: the party of the seat-weighted median legislator.
LaverDynamics: sticker, aggregator, hunter and predator rules
(Laver 2005; hunter headings from Philox stream step * P + party).
MergeSplitParties: shares before and after a merger or split.
SetterOutcome: Romer-Rosenthal setter proposal.
CommitteeOutcome: Denzau-Mackay gatekeeping under open or closed rules.
Party indices are 0-based, as the Python arm.
Usage
VoteShares(
positions,
voters,
weights = NULL,
rule = "proximity",
beta = 1,
salience = NULL
)
BestResponseEquilibrium(
voters,
n_parties,
grid,
weights = NULL,
start = NULL,
rule = "proximity",
beta = 1,
max_rounds = 200
)
StrategicVoteShares(positions, voters, weights = NULL, magnitude = 1)
EntryGame(voters, grid, weights = NULL, n_incumbents = 2, max_rounds = 100)
EffectiveNumberParties(shares)
RubinsteinBargaining(delta1, delta2)
MedianParty(positions, seats)
LaverDynamics(voters, positions, rules, n_steps, speed = 0.1, seed = 0)
MergeSplitParties(
positions,
voters,
weights = NULL,
merge = NULL,
split = NULL
)
SetterOutcome(setter, median, status_quo)
CommitteeOutcome(committee, floor, status_quo, rule = "closed")Arguments
- positions
Party positions (vector for 1-D, or matrix rows).
- voters
Voter ideal points (vector or matrix rows).
- weights
Voter weights, or NULL.
- rule
"proximity" or "logit"; for
CommitteeOutcome"open" or "closed".- beta
Logit sensitivity.
- salience
Dimension weights, or NULL.
- n_parties
Number of parties.
- grid
Candidate positions.
- start
Starting grid indices (0-based), or NULL.
- max_rounds
Maximum best-response rounds.
- magnitude
District magnitude.
- n_incumbents
Number of incumbents.
Party vote or seat shares.
- delta1, delta2
Discount factors.
- seats
Seat counts.
- rules
Decision rule of each party.
- n_steps
Number of steps.
- speed
Step length.
- seed
Philox seed.
- merge
Pair of 0-based party indices to merge, or NULL.
- split
c(index, delta) of a party to split, or NULL.
- setter, median, status_quo
Setter ideal, floor median and status quo.
- committee, floor
Committee and floor ideal points.
References
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Eaton, B. C. and Lipsey, R. G. (1975). Rev. Econ. Stud. 42, 27-49. Cox, G. W. (1997). Making Votes Count. Palfrey, T. R. (1984). Rev. Econ. Stud. 51, 139-156. Laakso, M. and Taagepera, R. (1979). Comparative Political Studies 12, 3-27. Golosov, G. V. (2010). Party Politics 16, 171-192. Rubinstein, A. (1982). Econometrica 50, 97-109. Laver, M. and Schofield, N. (1990). Multiparty Government. Laver, M. (2005). APSR 99, 263-281. Romer, T. and Rosenthal, H. (1978). Public Choice 33, 27-43. Denzau, A. T. and Mackay, R. J. (1983). AJPS 27, 740-761.